How wide should you make your web page?
Posted seven years ago
Based on 22500 unique IP addresses over the past week, reddit users have these browser widths:
The numbers on the bottom are browser widths (minus 40), and the numbers on the side are the counts of unique visitors with that width.
Data collection
At the time this blog posting was made, my blog had hand-drawn borders in the page title. They were generated by a CGI program on the fly. For each visitor, a number about 40 pixels below your browser width is recorded in my server logs. I wrote a perl script to create a histogram for unique visitors, and pasted the result into gnumeric to create the chart.
Results
The peaks seem to correspond to 1024, 1280, 1400, 1600, 1920 screen widths, with 1280 being the greatest peak. This indicates that most people have their browser window maximized.
There is also a section of uniformity between 1000 and 1280. This seems to be a sweet spot among those who do not maximize their browsers.
Surprisingly, there are still a few people running at 800x600 resolutions. And one at over 2500 pixels across.
Steve Hanov makes a living working on
Rhymebrain.com,
PriceMonkey.ca,
www.websequencediagrams.com,
and Zwibbler.com. He lives in
Waterloo, Canada.
Post comment
edit
Steve Hanov
four years ago
If the column is too wide for you, you are free to adjust the width of the browser window to your liking.
edit
P Smith
four years ago
Pixel size doesn't matter. The size of the human head does.
The main text on the screen should be no wider than the width of a human head, 50-60% of the screen width. This eliminates head movement and keeps the text within the peripheral vision of most people, reducing eye movement.
Ask yourself this: Do newspapers, magazine, dictionaries, encyclopedias and other print media have text across the full width of pages? Or are they printed in columns?
If it's any wider, it forces the reader to move his head or eyes and becomes annoying to read. If a site designer wants people to read the site and come back, he should make it comfortable to visit. For example, the main text on this blog looks fine on my netbook (1024x600) but is too wide to read comfortably on my 15" laptop screen (1366x768).
.
edit
P Smith
four years ago
Pixel size doesn't matter. The size of the human head does.
The main text on the screen should be no wider than the width of a human head, 50-60% of the screen width. This eliminates head movement and keeps the text within the peripheral vision of most people, reducing eye movement.
Ask yourself this: Do newspapers, magazine, dictionaries, encyclopedias and other print media have text across the full width of pages? Or are they printed in columns?
If it's any wider, it forces the reader to move his head or eyes and becomes annoying to read. If a site designer wants people to read the site and come back, he should make it comfortable to visit. For example, the main text on this blog looks fine on my netbook (1024x600) but is too wide to read comfortably on my 15" laptop screen (1366x768).
.
edit
Jer
five years ago
These numbers are misleading though -- just because people have large monitors doesn't mean they browse with the window maximised.
The best thing about a widescreen monitor is having two apps open side by side (like two columns) -- It's always *really* annoying when a site forces horizontal scrolling (or maximise).
Text line lengths can get waaay too long on a maximised, large screen (making it harder to read), so I actively avoid maximised browser windows.
edit
Beatrice Didgelock
six years ago
Your page should be just as wide as the client area of the browser. No wider, no narrower. Seriously, it isn't that hard - get coding!
edit
goodArticle
six years ago
NIce. 1280 is definitely dominating, but what this chart doesnt show is how high that category used to be and at what rate it is decreasing. 1600 has really picked up steam. Maybe its best to make 1600 and add horizonal scrollbar. 1600 is growing fast.
Finding Bieber: On removing duplicates from a set of documents
Using a locality sensitive hash, you can mark duplicates in millions of items in no time.
Asana's shocking pricing practices, and how you can get away with it too
If one apple costs $1, how much would five apples cost? How about 500? If everyday life, when you buy more of something, you get more bananas for your buck. But software companies are bucking the trend.
cairo blur image surface
This really should have been included in cairo. Instead, everyone that wants to have shadows has to roll their own blur function. Here's my take on it. I'll even release this into the public domain.
Give your Commodore 64 new life with an SD card reader
Dust off your old Commodore 64, and you could be the coolest kid on the block by plugging SD cards into it instead of floppies.
Coding tips they don't teach you in school
Some time-saving shortcuts for C code that will make your coworkers scream. In Awe.
My thoughts on various programming languages
Some ill-informed remarks on various programming languages.
Exploring sound with Wavelets
Here's a program to create scalograms of sound files.
How a programmer reads your resume (comic)
People thought it was a comic, so I never corrected them.